On 8/2/11 22:12 , Falko Bräutigam wrote:
I'm about to implement this. Seems to work well. Strong references for
timestamps and a (valid) cache for the states.
But now, after a ConcurrentEntityStateModificationException occurred and
the user has "merged" the entity versions, I don't see a way to tell the
ConcurrentModificationCheckConcern that this entity version is now
"merged" and hence "valid" (if it was not modified after this merge,
which I cannot detect either). Do I miss something?
What is a "merge"?
/Rickard
_______________________________________________
qi4j-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
