>From current documentation ( glossary, core ) it is not clear that TransientComposite support properties ( support is inherited from Composite , but this is not documented). And now there is also support to inject into POJO objects. So when one should use TransientComposite and when POJO ? Maybe this question will help to come with better name.
BeanComposite? ( but I like TransientComposite more ) cheers, - Tibor On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 5:19 PM, Niclas Hedhman <[email protected]> wrote: > PlainComposite? > > VanillaComposite? > > MutableComposite? > > PlainOldComposites? > > TastelessComposite? > > > On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 10:03 PM, Paul Merlin <[email protected]> wrote: >> Niclas Hedhman a écrit : >> >>> I have always had a hard time defending the TransientComposite name. >>> What does that mean? But, I can't come up with a better one either. >>> >>> Any suggestions? >> >> Yeah, I tend to think about them as plain Composites. >> I have no interesting suggestions in mind tough. >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> qi4j-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev > > > > -- > Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer > http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java > > I live here; http://tinyurl.com/3xugrbk > I work here; http://tinyurl.com/6a2pl4j > I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug > > _______________________________________________ > qi4j-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev _______________________________________________ qi4j-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
