sorry I have overlooked www.qi4j.org/<release> /Tibor
On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 11:23 PM, Tibor Mlynarik <[email protected]> wrote: > maybe instead current -> stable > > but why not have exact version number in the path, so links will point > always to the same content and not change over time ? > > www.qi4j.org/docs/1.4 > www.qi4j.org/docs/2.0 > www.qi4j.org/docs/2.1 > > /Tibor > > On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 8:51 AM, Niclas Hedhman <[email protected]> wrote: >> Gang, >> I have added a Pivotal story for adding Javadocs to the site and also >> one for "Versions", as we should keep the website for each released >> version. >> >> So we need to define the URL space. Anyone has any opinion on; >> >> www.qi4j.org/current/ --> The documentation root for the latest >> released codebase, i.e. what origin/master points to, but in reality a >> symlink to the latest release version. >> >> www.qi4j.org/develop/ --> The documentation root for the current head >> of development, i.e. what origin/develop points to. >> >> www.qi4j.org/<release>/ --> The documentation root for a released >> version, that is kept forever. >> >> >> Cheers >> -- >> Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer >> http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java >> >> I live here; http://tinyurl.com/3xugrbk >> I work here; http://tinyurl.com/6a2pl4j >> I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug >> >> _______________________________________________ >> qi4j-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev _______________________________________________ qi4j-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
