I am just worried that a "sample" is too much work, compared to a few well-named methods and interfaces,perhaps a couple of additional ones...
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 12:47 AM, Tibor Mlynarik <[email protected]> wrote: > Isn't for documentation better suited Forum sample ? > Sample is not finished, but some parts are working. I have started to > write test client ( no ui, just via rest client code) to understand > how rest api works. > And I can try to add functionality that will cover docs needs. > > cheers, > > Tibor > > On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 10:28 AM, Niclas Hedhman <[email protected]> wrote: >> I would be really happy if someone has an hour or two available to >> refactor the ContextResourceClientFactoryTest to be a bit more >> "realistic", i.e. more suitable for the documentation, which I have >> now started. It doesn't have to be more extensive, just better naming >> and perhaps some formatting. >> >> >> Cheers >> -- >> Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer >> http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java >> >> I live here; http://tinyurl.com/3xugrbk >> I work here; http://tinyurl.com/6a2pl4j >> I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug >> >> _______________________________________________ >> qi4j-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev > > _______________________________________________ > qi4j-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev -- Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java I live here; http://tinyurl.com/3xugrbk I work here; http://tinyurl.com/6a2pl4j I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug _______________________________________________ qi4j-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
