Kent,
My last reply mentionned tests in sample/dci-cargo, yours mentionned
tests in sample/dci.
Sorry for my mistake.
This change in JDK behavior is a mess.
In fact it's the previous behavior where getDeclaredMethods was
documented to return methods in random order but implementations were
predictibles that made developers used to the fact that tests are run in
source order.
We should welcome this change.
This means that non-independents tests need to be spotted and refactored.
I ran the unit tests a lot of times while working on JDK7 support and
found bad tests in extensions/reindexer (my bad) and sample/dci-cargo
but the ones in samples/dci never failed here ... happy randomness ...
There should not be a lot of non-independent tests anymore but we must
be vigilant.
To be continued.
/Paul
Kent Sølvsten a écrit :
sorry 'bout the broken commit. In my haste to flush everything from old
laptop before switching day job, I must have made a partial commit somehow.
I have problems with running the tests inside samples/dci when building on
JDK7 on windows. The same tests are running fine on JDK6.
It seems that for some obscure reason the test data (initialized inside
@beforeClass method) are reinitialized in every test when using JDK7,
which causes problems, since one of the tests removes money from a checking
account, assuming that a previous test have moved money into that account.
Any objections against me rewriting these tests to be completely isolated
unittests, instead of depending on reusing data?
/Kent
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Paul Merlin<[email protected]> wrote:
Gang,
Commit 55235f3c5194bf65a53b8f1abe2369**962019b9fa removed used files and
so broken the build.
See:https://github.com/Qi4j/qi4j-**sdk/commit/**
55235f3c5194bf65a53b8f1abe2369**962019b9fa<https://github.com/Qi4j/qi4j-sdk/commit/55235f3c5194bf65a53b8f1abe2369962019b9fa>
I reverted this commit.
By the way, Qi4j now works with Java 7, the feature branch has been merged.
/Paul
______________________________**_________________
qi4j-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ops4j.org/**mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev<http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev>
_______________________________________________
qi4j-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
_______________________________________________
qi4j-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
