Great. It is now done. On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 12:13 AM, Paul Merlin <[email protected]> wrote: > I've always felt it awkard too, so it's a +1 to rename configuration() as > get() > > Niclas Hedhman a écrit : > >> I was reading some tutorial code; >> >> Configuration<TravelPlanConfiguration> config; >> >> private void foo() >> { >> TravelPlanConfiguration tpConf = config.configuration(); >> String hostName = tpConf.hostName().get(); >> >> And it struck me that it feels awkward... The other methods are called >> refresh() and save(), so shouldn't configuration() actually be get() >> ??? >> >> So, the above would be; >> >> Configuration<TravelPlanConfiguration> config; >> >> private void foo() >> { >> String hostName = config.get().hostName().get(); >> >> >> WDYT? >> >> Cheers > > _______________________________________________ > qi4j-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
-- Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java I live here; http://tinyurl.com/3xugrbk I work here; http://tinyurl.com/6a2pl4j I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug _______________________________________________ qi4j-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
