In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Malcolm Cadman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writesYet applications like Browsers, DTP, Graphics, etc, are not part of what is supplied. Which makes sense, as this keeps the market open for the development of software.
But they are still developed. Go to Tucows and see how many shareware browsers there are. I do not care if there are big companies doing it. Little ones do this sort of stuff and do it very well and I buy a lot of shareware from these people. Development of replacement components for Windoze continues.
Erm ... that was what I was saying ... :-)
The other problem with 'in-built' facilities is that they will always need upgrading, so the OS will need upgrading - as all users will become discontent. Allowing the software applications to be built on top of the OS allows for easier flexibility - only some users become discontent, are they have a solution in adding newer application versions, or new software entirely.Nonsense. I have upgraded I.E. a couple of times with out changing the O/S. It is very easy. I have even changed versions within an O/S. You can do the same with Media Player and any of the other applications.
I was referring to 'in-built' as coded into the OS.
M$ Windows is soft-loaded on top of a basic IO system. Which has enabled it to develop and be flexible. Although there always comes a time when the OS has to move on, hence the many versions of Windows.
We have only had one version of QDOS, followed by a newer development SMSQ/E.
Application software like IE, Media Player, etc, run on top of Windows and with the basic IO system.
Obviously M$ have an advantage with coding in terms of how they integrate applications.
-- Malcolm Cadman _______________________________________________ QL-Users Mailing List
