David Tubbs wrote:
> Quite understandable, there seem to be many more knockers than
> constructivists here. All my inputs here have generated are facile denials
> of my assertion that no one is without access to the www. If your
> troglodyte BC chooses not to avail himself then that his choice.
Tony could put a question on the questionnaire to see if there are any
people wanting a QL ISP, asking NTL for info for setting up a Q60
is not fun, while Sonow does not support CHAP. Arnie is considering using
such a service, which maybe of use to other platforms.
As for new hardware, it might be possible to piggy back a 68030 and
68882 on a SGC, Th0r 21 style.
--
Tarquin Mills
ACCUS (Anglia Classic Computer Users Society)
http://www.speccyverse.me.uk/comp/accus/
_______________________________________________
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
