On Mon, 29 Nov 2004 at 15:56:40, Marcel Kilgus wrote:
(ref: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
>ZN wrote:
>> This setting could be fairly easily replaced by a new monitor
>> definition that would use all the available memory.
>
>But which would only result in even queerer resolutions like
>1024x1024? Especially with the trend clearly going to LCDs I don't
>think this is worth it. I only have LCDs in the house and while
>developing the driver it was difficult enough to test modes like
>512x480...
Exactly.
Ken Brickwood was using my modern 1280 x 1024 LCD monitor yesterday at
Byfleet. Even that refused to display one of the existing modes
(goodness knows which one).
The situation would be made far worse with extra odd modes.
Tony
--
QBBS (QL fido BBS 2:252/67) +44(0)1442-828255
tony@<surname>.co.uk http://www.firshman.co.uk
Voice: +44(0)1442-828254 Fax: +44(0)1442-828255
TF Services, 29 Longfield Road, TRING, Herts, HP23 4DG
_______________________________________________
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
