On Thu, 9 Dec 2004 at 12:15:16, Phoebus Dokos wrote:
(ref: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
> Thu, 09 Dec 2004 17:04:50 +0000,() David Tubbs
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> /wrote:
>
>> At 05:02 09/12/2004 -0500, you wrote:
>>> Most of the failures I have seen are due to inadequate cooling in
>>> either manufacturer but where liquid cooling (or peltier elements) have
>>> been applied I have seen virtually zero AMD defects compared to a
>>>general
>>> defect ration
>
>And of course once more I made the mistake of writing ratio as ration :-)
>>
>> I have been interested in the Peltier option, but how well does it
>>really work with all the extra watts going in ?
>>
>The trick is to power it from the outside :-) (Yeah I know it's extreme)
>
>There is another MUCHO COOL solution with an external radiator (looks
>really neat as it is a bluish aluminium cone) that needs no power
>whatsoever... thermodynamics takes care of coolant circulation... the
>name of that last one escapes me at the mo
Ben has his eyes on a water cooler!
Tony
--
QBBS (QL fido BBS 2:252/67) +44(0)1442-828255
tony@<surname>.co.uk http://www.firshman.co.uk
Voice: +44(0)1442-828254 Fax: +44(0)1442-828255
TF Services, 29 Longfield Road, TRING, Herts, HP23 4DG
_______________________________________________
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
