Let me clear up the minor confusion here:

Roy wood wrote:

>Almost all the Auroras out there were made by Qubbesoft. I have a few 
>here made by Nasta that have the correct IDC sockets but all the others 
>did not have this. A lot of people got this wrong. Just to add to the 
>problems they are not the usual, straight through, wiring so you cannot 
>use one of the cables from a PC.

Tony firshman wrote:

> I vaguely remember looking at this a long time ago. The pinouts -look-
> right but I think Nasta said he got it wrong, and one couldn't use
> ribbon cable IDC connectors direct.

> I have found an Aurora manual, and by golly, it -is- wired correctly.
> A straight through ribbon connector with IDC will give a standard PC 
> type serial plug.

Well, here's the deal:
The cables I used as a jig were from a PC that had them wired correctly, or
I should say, logically. They used the same system i did, a piece of ribbon
cable and a press-fit connector on both ends. If you build a serial cable
for the Aurora that way, it's wired correctly.
Surprisingly, almost all PCs have it wired 'wrong' - on the Aurora side the
pins alternate row to row as the pin numbers increase (which is the
standard numbering for this kind of connector), on the DB9 side, they go
first one row, then the other, again standard for this type of connector.
On the PC they have to go 1-1, 2-2 etc, which means that you cannot wire a
flat cable directly as in that case the pin numbers do not correspond on
the connectors, due to different numbering standards. because of this, you
CANNOT use PC serial board cables on teh Aurora, with very very few
exceptions. This should not be a problem as it's very easy to do your own
using press-fit connectors, and that was the goal. Incidentally, PC
manufacturers use cheap sweatshop labour to solder the connectors by hand
:(

Ffibys ;) wrote:

> Maybe they were more than one versions of Aurora?

No, just the one. There is going to be a Special Edition soon (assuming I
don't just keel over one day with the amount of work i have to do these
days). the reason why the last 25 or so were not assembled yet is that I
plan on putting a half meg flash ROM onto the board so that SMSQ/E can be
booted directly. It's a minor mod if you are building an Aurora from
scratch, but not on an already built one.

Wolfgang Lenerz wrote in response to Ffibys:

>> (The soul of Nasta is an abyss ;-) 
> Oh, that's why he looks back at you when you look at him, then .

No, I do that because it's polite. You should consider yourself lucky that
I only use my powers for good ;)

Tony Firshman wrote abut the extra 4 pins on the Aurora ROM port that
nothing uses...

Well, there is, hopefully, soon going to be somethiong that uses them,
namely a small Ethernet board... assuming again I don't keel over. Not far
from it at the moment as I have the mother in law of all sore throats and
sinus inflamations :(

Nasta

_______________________________________________
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm

Reply via email to