Doug L. wrote:
<\snip> > I would be interested in taking a look at whether any of the current near-Net > able packages come close to getting a moderately enhanced QL on the Net. As I > remember, SoQL is one and may get further work so as to come closer to being > truly Net-enabled. But it's my understanding it still requires Aurora (and a > recent SMSQ, but I may be able to get/afford SMSQ). > > If there's a good possibility of doing something, e.g. programming/coding, > that would enable a QL black box that's within shouting distance of original > to get on the net, I'd be interested, though like so many folk on this list I > don't have limitless spare time. I don't really know enough right now to know > whether there's even a respectable chance of fitting things into 4MB (and > maybe just floppies, though HDD might be easier for me & my situation than I > realize. Not entirely in the spirit, but possibly one can tolerate it :-). I > don't really know _what_ those things are. > > Hi Doug, I could send you the soQL package. It may not be vapourware but I'm afraid it dose seem to have become "frozenware" but it should work on a fairly basic QL. Let me know if you want me to mail it to you. I would recommend taking a look at Poebus's article series from QL-Today Jon. _______________________________________________ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
