<SNIP>
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Dilwyn Jones
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
> <SNIP>
>
>> Rather sad really, although I'm an emulator man myself as my main
>> system is a PC with QPC2, but I still have and still use an Aurora SGC
>> system and a QL+Gold Card. It would be really sad if this sort of
>> viewpoint caused no more hardware developments and adversely affected
>> sales or development of Q60 or future machines.
>>
As a recent returnee to the QL scene after too long away, I am very keen
to use the original hardware and expand it as far as it possible and
practical. However, I am well aware of its modern limitations and would
not be able to depend totally on my QLs for all my computing needs. But,
on the other hand, why should it be necessary to just have just the one
solution? Ok, there are related issue of space and cost using multiple
systems, but those aside, I am happy tinkering with whatever system is
best suited to what I want to do. Hell, I still play with CP/M for fun
(!) on a Spectrum +3 and BBC Basic on a Acorn BBC Master 512K from time
to time . . . but then maybe I am just a bit odd?
_______________________________________________
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
