David Tubbs schreef: > At 00:31 26/05/2006 +0100, you wrote: > >> Not sure if your question is for real, if it is you have defined the >> subject as numeric, since most (if not all) computers throw a wobbly at >> infinity the answer must be less. > OOOps, boobed did not mean that, obviosly fewer ! But curiously still a > lesser number. > > Would 'a smaller number' be correct here too? François Van Emelen
_______________________________________________ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
