You are quite correct (as usual) Geoff. Volume 23 Issue 2 April/May 2006 page 15 shows the updated total figure as 219. I knew I'd done an update but couldn't find the notes I made at the time. However the Magazine shows the result. Thanks for the memory jogger, Geoff.
John G. ----- Original Message ----- From: "gwicks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 7:33 PM Subject: Re: [ql-users] QLer ages - Membership numbers > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "John Gilpin" > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 1:17 PM > Subject: Re: [ql-users] QLer ages - Membership numbers > > >> Referring to Quanta Membership numbers, these were reported in my annual >> report to the Quanta AGM in April 2006 as being 161 (as at the 31st >> January). This figure excludes any renewals received after that date. >> This >> report was included in the Quanta AGM reports published in the QUANTA >> Magazine Volume 23 Issue. 1 Feb/Mar 2006. >> > > Naughty! Naughty! John. > > If you remember I queried this figure at the AGM as it showed there had > been > a 45% decline in membership in 12 months. A later figure you published in > the magazine is 219. > > Can we have some consistency please? In the past the membership figure > quoted at the AGM was always that on 31st December, which probably gives > the > most accurate indication of the true size of Quanta. > > I now have a little exercise for the committee. Look up the membership for > the last ten years, plot this on a graph and then extrapolate it to > determine membership at the end of the 3 year term of the current > officers. > You are in for a nasty shock!, > > Best wishes, > > Geoff > > > _______________________________________________ > QL-Users Mailing List > http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm _______________________________________________ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
