Laurence W Reeves wrote: > This strikes me as a *very* serious bug. I don't quite think so. It's easily detectable, i.e. doesn't give a wrong result that could go unnoticed but is a hard error. Despite this fact it's been in there for probably well over a decade, so in the end it can't have been that bad.
Still it's a bug and I'll try to investigate when I find the time. But my years with plenty of free time have finally come to an end. I've finished University and am now working full time as a independent software developer. Add all my new hobbies to the mix and there is not much time left, I'm afraid. If on the other hand somebody else volunteers to fix this, be my guest! :-) Marcel _______________________________________________ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
