Tony Firshman wrote:
Ralf Reköndt wrote, On 6/01/10 18:37:
Derek Stewart wrote:
The blank lines were the encoding in Thunderbird... I did not configure
correctly.
Ah yes - that is what I thought. you were using *exactly* the same
Thunderbord version as me, but under Windoze.
In-line quoting, as I did for the this comment, makes for very easy
contextual reading.
This is totally impossible with bottom quoting.
But still I prefer the new message at the top.
Me too.
We will have to start another ql-users for bottom quoters (8-)#
This is beginning to sound like Lilliput.
Like Lau, I tend not to read (well more relevantly, not understand)
bottom quoted messages, and hence do not reply to them.
Also bottom quoting is only good for *one* level of quoting.
I see absolutely no problem with top quoting, as long as there is
judicious editing.
Seems to be just what one used to do over the years. Me, I prefer to read
the actual things on top, others prefer vice versa. But I have no problem,
if *everyone* do it here the same way ;-).
Cheers...Ralf
_______________________________________________
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
