On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 6:47 PM, Lee Privett <[email protected]> wrote:
> Ok, I didn't understand most of whats being said here, other than 'fit it > all in an QL' and 'ARM', the first sounds exciting the second would have a > certain person spinning in their grave if 1. they were in one and 2. if it > was implemented :-) > > Lee Privett I've had three generations of platform love. 1st: Sinclair QL - 1984 to 1994 or so. 2nd: Acorn RISC - 1992 to 2001 3rd: Mac OS X - 2001 to present. OSX transitioned to ARM perfectly. Acorns, well, they invented it. D'uh! And the QL... Hmmm. So, if you have a choice between ARM and Intel architectures... it's a no-brainer, given the skills and resources of our community and the way we use our qlones. Hehe. I said glones. Dave _______________________________________________ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
