gdgqler wrote: >> One other way, for Peter, is an open source version of SMSQ. > This is well overdue!
Times have changed. Just for the record, the current license was quite fitting for the time and I'm still in favour of some aspects of it, but all in all I don't mind a different license if it helps further development. Just my 2 cents. Marcel _______________________________________________ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
