Tony Firshman wrote:
> One other way, for Peter, is an open source version of SMSQ.

At least it _was_. Now that so much time has been spent toward a Minerva
based solution with other drivers, SMSQ/E would probably not save me
work anymore.

Times have changed. A decade ago, an open source SMSQ/E would have
allowed me to hit the market with my 266 MHz "high end" machine and
vastly outperform all emulators. Today, these opportunities for "high
end" QL hardware are lost forever.

A major QL hardware today would serve "retro computing" rather than
going for maximum speed and maximum features. Minerva is not bad for
that purpose - if it can be finished :-)

Peter
_______________________________________________
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm

Reply via email to