On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 12:36 PM, Tony Firshman <[email protected]> wrote:
> David Tubbs wrote, on 15/Feb/11 17:58 | Feb15: > > >> >>>> So that's why I think such wasteful distribution is equivalent to >>>> spamming. >>>> >>> Indeed. Top quoting does need some editing and snipping. >>> >>> Tony >>> >> >> I suspect some email clients an be set n how he quote rmght be unware of >> the crud going out, I only use an old Eudora. No frills. >> >> ... and no spell checker (8-)# > > Thunderbird does have a QuoteCollapse extension that hides quoting, but > *all* the gory details appear if one clicks 'reply' so no excuses for not > ediitng in this case. > > That said, I think it's more because the list is more active than normal (I lurked before I posted) so now the list is all active, threads are getting longer than people are used to, and the usual way of nesting replies breaks down a little bit. Dave _______________________________________________ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
