On 11 Mar 2011, at 22:38, Dave Park wrote: > A genuine 680X0: > + compatibility, already designed > - availability and price >
Aren't these obsolescent or obsolete? > An emulated 680X0 in FPGA form: > + highly configurable, offers single chip solution, 68k VHDL sources in > public domain, very low cost > - heavier design load, harder to debug. > Speed? Would it have 68020+ instructions? > Software emulation: > + Already here/done, highly reconfigurable, no hardware skills needed > - Intel hardware too big for just a QL - needs to do other things too - > expensive. As you say - done. George _______________________________________________ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
