Hi Adrian,
I also have never found it a good idea, that in QPC2 all Proc/Fn are showed
under "EXTRAS". It was always very helpful under QDOS to just show the
additional linked in ones (like TK2 does). It was also very useful, because
it shows standard ones, which were newly linked in because of modifications
or similar things.
Cheers...Ralf
----- Original Message -----
From: "Adrian Ives" <[email protected]>
To: "QL Users List" <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 30, 2012 4:44 PM
Subject: [Ql-Users] Wherefore art thou, SMSQ?
In the process of bringing some of the resident extensions that I made
available back in the late nineties, I have come across some code that
interrogates the S*BASIC Name Table and lists entries filtered according
to their type. Two categories produce lists of resident procedures and
functions that are either built into QDOS or have been LRESPR'd.
The simple test applied in the original code is to see if the absolute
address of the routine has an absolute address < 0xC000. This works OK
for the plethora of QDOS ROMs out there (apart from, presumably, the
mythical Tyche) but it does not work with SMSQ under QPCII.
Does anyone know if there is a documented and reliable way of finding
out the address address range that any version of SMSQ has been loaded
into?
Alternatively can anyone suggest a better way of performing the test?
--
Adrian
www.memorylanecomputing.com
_______________________________________________
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
_______________________________________________
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
