Evening Daniel, Welcome back to the QL.
I replied to Dilwyn earlier on this. I realise my mistake, as usual, only when my post went public. Sigh! No worries! Cheers, Norm. On 28 August 2017 09:32:38 BST, Daniel Baum via Ql-Users <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote: >Hi Norman, > >I (apparently) wrote this about 20 years ago. This has reminded me that >the >idea was to write some kind of debugger for superbasic, but I really >don't >remember how it worked. > >You're right of course about local variables. Perhaps my experience >with >programming since I wrote this will enable me to overcome the problems >that >I was obviously having then. > >Rgds, > >Daniel > > >On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 10:34 AM, Norman Dunbar via Ql-Users < >email@example.com> wrote: > >> Dilwyn asked: "...has huge problems with local variables, which seem >> to lose their names when out of scope. If anyone knows how to >reconnect >> local variables to their names when they are out of scope, please let >me >> know. " >> >> >> Could you explain, for the old and infirm (me), how you mean "goes >out of >> scope", please? >> >> I'm obviously not understanding what you wrote because a variable >that >> goes out of scope, in any language, will become undefined, or >completely >> missing, surely? Do any value it had, will be 'lost'. >> >> Sorry if I'm being particularly thick this morning! >> >> >> Cheers, >> Norm. >> -- >> Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. >> _______________________________________________ >> QL-Users Mailing List >> >_______________________________________________ >QL-Users Mailing List -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. _______________________________________________ QL-Users Mailing List