Welcome back to the QL.
I replied to Dilwyn earlier on this. I realise my mistake, as usual, only when
my post went public. Sigh! No worries!
On 28 August 2017 09:32:38 BST, Daniel Baum via Ql-Users
>I (apparently) wrote this about 20 years ago. This has reminded me that
>idea was to write some kind of debugger for superbasic, but I really
>remember how it worked.
>You're right of course about local variables. Perhaps my experience
>programming since I wrote this will enable me to overcome the problems
>I was obviously having then.
>On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 10:34 AM, Norman Dunbar via Ql-Users <
>> Dilwyn asked: "...has huge problems with local variables, which seem
>> to lose their names when out of scope. If anyone knows how to
>> local variables to their names when they are out of scope, please let
>> know. "
>> Could you explain, for the old and infirm (me), how you mean "goes
>> scope", please?
>> I'm obviously not understanding what you wrote because a variable
>> goes out of scope, in any language, will become undefined, or
>> missing, surely? Do any value it had, will be 'lost'.
>> Sorry if I'm being particularly thick this morning!
>> Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
>> QL-Users Mailing List
>QL-Users Mailing List
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
QL-Users Mailing List