Hi,



FALSE AND ERROR is FALSE ? That cannot be !

I disagree.

FALSE AND ... whatever  is FALSE since whatever is never evaluated.

FALSE AND ERROR has to be ERROR !!!

Definitely not.


The first condition (a<>0) is NOT met and so, in any other programming
language I use, the second condition isn't even tested, as the result
will be "false" anyway because of this.

So you will ever get big BIG ERRORs...


I'm not sure I understand. The above example makes sure that the error doesn't even happen which is the whole reason to write it like that.

SBASIC is better ;-))

In this instance, not to my mind. :-(

Wolfgang
_______________________________________________
QL-Users Mailing List

Reply via email to