I havent tested your suggestion yet, Wolfgang, but what I found so far was that gggbbbbbrrrrrgg0 appears (to my eye) to look cleaner than gggbbbbbrrrrrggW. Is that so wrong? ;)

BTW, when converting the translation to assembler, I found the following representation helpful:


GGGggRRR rrBBBbbW = mode 33
gggBBBbb RRRrrGGG = mode 32
gggBBBbb RRRrrGGW = mode 32 translated

Per
On 16/12/2017 10:55, Wolf via Ql-Users wrote:
No, not the same as %gggbbbbbrrrrrggW, as suggested in the original post.

Wolfgang

On 16/12/2017 10:18, Peter Graf via Ql-Users wrote:
Wolfgang Lenerz via Ql-Users wrote:
I'd do it this way

%ggWbbbbbrrrrrggg

Which is the same :)


_______________________________________________
QL-Users Mailing List


_______________________________________________
QL-Users Mailing List


.


_______________________________________________
QL-Users Mailing List

Reply via email to