Marcel, would you be willing to share your modifications for QL-SD2?
On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 10:51 AM, pgraf--- via Ql-Users <
> On 2 Feb 2018 at 16:25, Marcel Kilgus via Ql-Users wrote:
> > Well, I said I'd do it and apparently I did it:
> > https://www.kilgus.net/2018/02/02/clonetastic-ql-sd-clone-
> What surprises me is this: "With the original Verilog code my clone
> didn't work at all, so it's definitely not just the different chip."
> With a normal GC, the original QL-SD worked relatively well,
> compared to the SGC. On some GC systems it was even fully stable
> hardware-wise. So if we assume that the electrical characteristics
> of the XC9572 play a minor role, why did it not work _at_all_?
> A significant difference between Original GC and Tetroid?
> QL-Users Mailing List
QL-Users Mailing List