Pedantic? Or correct!

I'm a pedant's baddest nightmare. ;-)


Cheers,
Norm.
-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

On 9 January 2020 22:47:27 GMT, John Alexander via Ql-Users 
<ql-users@lists.q-v-d.com> wrote:
>Indeed, one might say it's more of a mark up decription of what you 
>would like to see the hardware been rather than a S/W program to run on
>the H/W.
>Sounds so pedantic doesn't it ;-)JA
>
>On Thursday, 9 January 2020, 22:11:31 GMT, Norman Dunbar via Ql-Users
><ql-users@lists.q-v-d.com> wrote:  
> 
> See! I said I knew nothing! ;-)
>
>On 9 January 2020 16:29:50 GMT, Peter Graf via Ql-Users
><ql-users@lists.q-v-d.com> wrote:
>>Norman Dunbar via Ql-Users wrote:
>>> I get that it's a software description of some hardware.
>>
>>Not software. It is simply a hardware description, and the result is
>>pure hardware, i.e. flipflops, gates, wires. You can as well describe
>>he
>>same hardware in a schematic rather than text.
>>
>>It is important to understand that no emulation is involved and there
>>is
>>no difference to other logic chips, except that an FPGA can be
>>re-configured. Like GALs, just more complex.
>>
>>From the same hardware description, is is also possible to manufacture
>>customized chips, called ASICs, which have a fixed logic.
>>_______________________________________________
>>QL-Users Mailing List
>
>-- 
>Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
>_______________________________________________
>QL-Users Mailing List
>  
>_______________________________________________
>QL-Users Mailing List
_______________________________________________
QL-Users Mailing List

Reply via email to