I have already tried roughly all the various solutions and obviously we
know very well that they are solutions they don't really know satisfaction.
I also speak from the readability point of view, when you have to get your
hands by modifying the code written years before or written by other nested
cycles of functions are difficult to understand.
My question is straightforward: would anyone with assembler knowledge want
to try their hand at creating a new extension capable of solving the
I can offer him a drink! (good Italian wine!)


Il giorno sab 20 giu 2020 alle ore 23:24 pjwitte via Ql-Users <
ql-users@lists.q-v-d.com> ha scritto:

> On 20/06/2020 17:00, Jan Bredenbeek via Ql-Users wrote:
> > Op za 20 jun. 2020 14:01 schreef Dave Park via Ql-Users <
> > ql-users@lists.q-v-d.com>:
> >
> >> ooGyebd = Goodbye
> >> goodbye <> Goodbye
> >>
> > Use a hash algorithm like CRC-16 or CRC-32? ;-)
> Thats probably the fastest solution so far :o) Maybe overkill for just
> a few items. INSTR is pretty fast - and its built in.
> Per
> _______________________________________________
> QL-Users Mailing List
QL-Users Mailing List

Reply via email to