I have already tried roughly all the various solutions and obviously we know very well that they are solutions they don't really know satisfaction. I also speak from the readability point of view, when you have to get your hands by modifying the code written years before or written by other nested cycles of functions are difficult to understand. My question is straightforward: would anyone with assembler knowledge want to try their hand at creating a new extension capable of solving the problem? I can offer him a drink! (good Italian wine!)
:-D Il giorno sab 20 giu 2020 alle ore 23:24 pjwitte via Ql-Users < ql-users@lists.q-v-d.com> ha scritto: > On 20/06/2020 17:00, Jan Bredenbeek via Ql-Users wrote: > > Op za 20 jun. 2020 14:01 schreef Dave Park via Ql-Users < > > ql-users@lists.q-v-d.com>: > > > >> ooGyebd = Goodbye > >> goodbye <> Goodbye > >> > > Use a hash algorithm like CRC-16 or CRC-32? ;-) > > Thats probably the fastest solution so far :o) Maybe overkill for just > a few items. INSTR is pretty fast - and its built in. > > Per > > > _______________________________________________ > QL-Users Mailing List > _______________________________________________ QL-Users Mailing List
