In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Malcolm Lear
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes

>Try a system reset and running it again. Due to old protection stuff it 
>will complain
>if the cadtk.ext is reloaded without a reset. Meanwhile if I have the 
>time it will be
>fixed.
>
>Malcolm Cadman wrote:
>
>> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Malcolm Lear
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>> 
>>> My mistake, sorry. Renaming the file cadtk.bin to cadtk.ext should solve the
>>> problem. QPCII works quite happily with dot extensions.
>> 
>> 
>> OK ... the 'cadtk_ext' is the binary file ... there is no 'cadtk_bin'
>> file supplied in the present distribution.
>> 
>> I have now got this as the boot file >
>> 
>> 100 dev$='win1_PCB_'
>> 110 a=RESPR(7052) :LBYTES dev$&'tk_ext'     ,a:CALL a
>> 120 a=RESPR(14124):LBYTES dev$&'printer_ext',a:CALL a
>> 130 a=RESPR(32224):LBYTES dev$&'cadtk_ext',a:CALL a
>> 140 REMark CALL a,0             :REMark AUTOMATIC (does not always work)
>> 150 REMark CALL a,512,256,131072:REMark QL
>> 160 REMark CALL a,640,350,205472:REMark QXL EGA   (screen address may
>> vary)
>> 170 REMark CALL a,640,480,238240       :REMark QXL VGA   (  "       "
>> "   "  )
>> 180 REMark CALL a,800,600,238240:REMark QXL SVGA  (  "       "     "   "
>> )
>> 182 CALL a,SCR_XLIM,SCR_YLIM,SCR_BASE:REMark SMSQ/E
>> 190 LRUN dev$&'cad_bas'
>> 
>> It now gives an 'invalid parameter' report at line 182
>> 
>> The 'xlim' reports as 640, and the 'ylim' as 480.  It is the 'scr_base'
>> that it doesn't like.

Malcolm Lear has now sent me a new version of pcbcad.  There was a
problem with the SMSQ/E scr_base in the cadtk_ext file.

It now loads OK ... nice front screen :-)  Thanks.

However, there is an error report in the basic file - cad_bas - at line
1380:1 error in expression >

1380 padsize=INT(a$/5E-3+1E-3) : IF padsize>63 THEN padsize=63

Does it need another set of brackets ?
Like padsize=INT(a$/(5E-3+1E-3)) ?

I've forgotten what the evaluation priorities are ...

I note that the basic file is numbered up to 22790 :-( ... large ...

-- 
Malcolm Cadman

Reply via email to