Here's the Dhrystone timings for my Q60 with overclocked 68060RC50 at 60
MHz.
C68 compiled GCC compiled
Dhrystone/s 57339.4 76663.6
VAX MIPS 32.635 43.633
Both timings were done with COPYBACK cache-mode enabled.
>Dhrystone / s 24789,3
>VAX Mips 14,11
>Bogomips 20,52
> >
> > Was it the latest (gcc-compiled) dhrystone v2.1 benchmark ?
> > If not, please get it from my Web site and retry... ;-)
>
> C68 compiled GCC compiled
>
>Dhrystone / s 24863,3 32552
>VAX Mips 14,11 18.5
>Bogomips 20,52 30.7
>
>
>
> > This makes QPC2v2 on Athlon 1000 faster than my Turbo-QXL (the
> > 35MHz one: 23364 Dhrystones/s, 9 VAX Mips, 21,8 BogoMips) in
> > integer calculations. QPC2v2 will still be slower for programs
> > using the FPU though (mainly POV and ghostscript).
>
>It's really a pity that the QXL was designed with a so bad interface with
>the PC world (even the latest version did not satisfy me at all)
>
These timings show that native 68k code on the Q60 can be around 2.3 times
faster than emulated 68k code on the Athlon 1000. Still, 2.3 Ghz chips can't
be far away...
...haven't tried bogomips yet
bye, Mark Swift
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
