In article <5.0.2.1.0.20010221185215.00a40210@pop>, Phoebus Dokos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes >At 05:19 ìì 02/21/2001, you wrote: > >>Getting back on topic - how is QPC2 v2 on Win 98 or later and/or NT ? > >I tried it on Win 95b, Win98 SE, WinME, NT4 (SP6) and Win2000. >It is more stable on WinNT4, Faster on Win98 and I think the golden middle >is WinME. Crashes less often than with 98 but is less stable than NT4. BTW >with ME WQXT2 works 10 times better. All of a sudden big QXL.WIN problems >disappeared (see my article on QLT). I guess this has to do with the >Autoexec.bat, config.sys migration to the registry though. Somehow under >Win98 WQXT2 didn't communicate nicely with QLTOOLS Umm ... a good report then, thanks. A useful piece of software development to keep the QL spirit alive in the PC world :-) The one thing that I find is that it grabs memory, and likes to be the first task loaded. -- Malcolm Cadman
- Re: [ql-users] QPC2 and floppy drives Malcolm Cadman
- Re: [ql-users] QPC2 and floppy drives Peter S Tillier
- Re: [ql-users] QPC2 and floppy drives Geoff Wicks
- Re: [ql-users] QPC2 and floppy drives Tony Firshman
- Re: [ql-users] QPC2 and floppy drives Ian Pizer
- Re: [ql-users] QPC2 and floppy drives Malcolm Cadman
- Re: [ql-users] QPC2 and floppy drives Timothy Swenson
- Re: [ql-users] QPC2 and floppy drives Malcolm Cadman
- Re: [ql-users] QPC2 and floppy drives Phoebus Dokos
- RE: [ql-users] QPC2 and floppy drives Malcolm Cadman
- RE: [ql-users] QPC2 and floppy drives Norman Dunbar
- Re: [ql-users] QPC2 and floppy drives Malcolm Cadman
- Re: [ql-users] QPC2 and floppy drives Marcel Kilgus
- Re: [ql-users] QPC2 and floppy drives Malcolm Cadman
- Re: [ql-users] QPC2 and floppy drives Dilwyn Jones
- Re: [ql-users] QPC2 and floppy drives Timothy Swenson
- RE: [ql-users] QPC2 and floppy drives M M Lwin
- Re: [ql-users] QPC2 and floppy drives Robert Newson
- Re: [ql-users] QPC2 and floppy drives Dilwyn Jones