Robert Newson makes some magical things to make me read
} 
} > Entering "PRINT start" at this juncture yealds:
} >     4.07296E6
} > 
} > Running the program again immediately (using the same data) yealds:
} >     4.07192E6
} 
} This difference is because you've just RESPRed another 1024 bytes of
} memory (subject to system rounding/overheads) in line 150!
} 

Why do you RESPR ?
Why not ALCHP ...

My current guess would be that 'start' is a float number and
that the 4.07296E6 is missing precision, hence a bad address.

Have you tried start% instead ?
Using ALCHP instead of RESPR should also provide you with a lower 
address. And you can free it later too (when you have finished with
TRA).


Reply via email to