----- Original Message -----
From: "Norman Dunbar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2001 8:19 AM
Subject: RE: [ql-users] Metacomco C and Sandy CP/M
> Dave,
>
> the fact that I have to hunt for the disc means I never use it either -
C68
> is so much better and less buggy. I don't think Dave Walker (and his
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> brother) get enough recognition for the work they do. I for one am very
^^^^^^^
> grateful to them.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> Norman.
>
I'll echo that. Also C68 is ANSI89-compliant, which MCC C wasn't - it was
Lattice C - OK in its time, but now highly OOD!
I found that MCC C worked OK on my machines, but I switched over to C68 when
the version with float came out v2(?) and haven't used MCC C since.
Dave has also been very helpful when problems have occurred or some change
was wanted to MultiDiscover. I had a lot of material on Spectrum disks
using the GDOS format and once provided with the disk format and track
layout Dave provided an update that successfully read all the disks that I
wanted to transfer in only a few days. That's what I call service.
Peter
--
Peter S Tillier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Opinions expressed are my own and not necessarily those of my employer
