In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Tony Firshman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>On Wed, 12 Sep 2001 at 21:30:15, Malcolm Cadman wrote:
>(ref: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
>
>>In article <ja$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Tony Firshman
>><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>>>Well the first 'real' mailing has gone out.
>>>
>>>It was again depressing to get another 100 or so rejects over and above
>>>the list I bored you with last time. I only got a handful of
>>>corrections from this list, and there were a lot of current QL users on
>>>the list.
>>
>>All came through fine on Demon ... thanks for the effort.
>I am glad it was welcome.
>It took a great deal of time both vetting the list, coping with rejects,
>and preparing the text.
>I hope it was worth it.
>
>It was very depressing to get one very tart and impersonal reply saying
>that he did not like to get spam.
>
>... and from someone very well known in the QL field.
>
>I hope this is not a general attitude. There are no commercial traders
>left now, and I would hope that us few survivors would be encouraged to
>stay. I must say when I got the email I felt like jacking it in.
>I feel a bit better today - ie not shaking in anger (8-)#
Umm ... a bit depressing to hear that.
I noted that with the amount of detail you included that you must have
put in considerable time ... so, once again, much appreciated.
I will certainly file it for reference.
Keep up the good work, and don't let the ******** grind you down :-)
I do an occasional distribution mailing list for the London Quanta
Group, so I know the effort it takes to put something together.
--
Malcolm Cadman
