Phoebus,
You are really sad :o)
Why leave a perfectly good Greece for a home in Pennsylvania ?
I can see a couple of (minor) flaws with your suggestion, but as an
exercise, it appeals to my sense of humor quite a bit. The flaws are :
what happens if we use PortAsm/68K and there are bugs in the generated code
- we'd need to be seriously good Intel assembly language programmers to fix
that - I suspect only Marcus would be able to sort it out.
I'd have to learn Intel assembly myself, then do a series of articles in QL
Toady - and you'd all get very very bored very very quickly :o)
Have you SEEN Intel assembly - it is awful !
All the system variables, Basic variables, interrupts, vectors, traps
whouldn't be there any more so we'd have to either code in C - oops, forgot,
we can't, no C compiler :o)
It just wouldn't be QDOSMSQ any more toto !!
Nice mental exercise though.
Norman.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
Norman Dunbar EMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Database/Unix administrator Phone: 0113 289 6265
Fax: 0113 289 3146
Lynx Financial Systems Ltd. URL: http://www.Lynx-FS.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
