Marcel Kilgus wrote: > Claude Mourier 00 wrote: > > I wonder what is QPC overhead (it's not to offense Marcel : QPC is a great > > product) : does anybody know the slowdown factor eaten by the emulator, or > > in other word, what is the factor to apply to the speed of SMSQ under QPC > to > > have an idea of SMSQ speed written directly for x86 ? > > Depends on too many factors. As QPC's currently only an interpreter, > 20 or more could be feasible. I expect much less for a JIT compiler > version, but I don't know whether that will ever happen. > > Anyway x86 assembler is something nobody wants to program really, > especially when coming from the 68k corner, believe me.
Or even if coming from mainframe assembler! -- Peter S Tillier [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED] Opinions expressed are my own and not necessarily those of my employer.
