In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Thierry Godefroy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes >On Thu, 3 Jan 2002 15:27:56 -0000 , Norman Dunbar wrote: > >> Well, I'm running QPC2v2 on Win2k - what's wrong with it ? > >Apart from being slowest than Win95, more bloated (if at all >possible) and giving you no way to run in TRUE DOS (a MUST on >desktop PCs for QXL !), nothing is wrong... > >> Win956 is way too flakey for anything > >95 OSR2, once patched appropriately with all bugfixes available >from Microsoft site, is CERTAINLY more stable than 98 or 2K, >stable enough anyway to run QPC2 (which is the ONLY reason why >I keep Win95 on my laptop knowadays... if only QPC2 could run >under Linux !!!).
I can confirm that QPC2 is solid with Win95, or is that the other way around ? -- Malcolm Cadman
