At 01:11 �� 25/1/2002 -0500, you wrote: >At 09:43 �� 25/1/2002 +0100, you wrote: > >>Hi Phoebus, >> >> >Check this out... interesting... >> >>uClinux could indeed be ported to SGC, if the details needed for low-level >>programming weren't Miracles secrets. >> >>But remember: uClinux is NOT Linux! > ><snip> is a device cold the uCDimm <snip>
COLD? (Called) hmmm Now that's Spell Wrecker not Spell Checker... Geoff must do something about that :-) Phoebus
