In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Richard Zidlicky
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 06:55:53PM +0100, Wolfgang Lenerz wrote:
>> On 7 Feb 2002, at 16:11, Richard Zidlicky wrote:
>> 
>> > 
>> > Btw, out of 821 messages I have (selectively) archived of this group 
>> > a mere 172 were sent using Outlook. Eudora 262, Turnpike 68, Bat 37, 
>> > sylpheed 24, Lotus 6, Calypso 59, Mozilla 51, kmail 27, talk 1, 
>> > pine 69, mutt 91. Totally incomplete and unrepresentative survey.
>> > 
>> 
>> So you are not archiving mine, then, hmmm? Why the ostracism?
> 
>I've missed Pegasus, sorry. So that makes
>
>35 Pegasus in total, 30x v3.12c, 3x v4.0-beta 40, 1x v3.12a,
>1x plain v3.12
> 
>> And  none from a QL mail prog :((((( (phew back on topic)
>
>Most likely I have simply missed them because I don't know
>which identification to look for, this was a very simple
>'grep | wc -l' job.
>Looking more carefully, there were aproximately 1200 messages 
>and not nearly all user agents were recognised by my search.
>
>
>Bye
>Richard
>
>A fairly incomplete list of recognised mailers, most of which
>I've never even heard about:

< clip >

Interesting list :-) ... thanks for that, certainly a good variety.

-- 
Malcolm Cadman

Reply via email to