In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Tony Firshman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>On  Thu, 21 Feb 2002 at 15:22:56, you wrote:
>(ref: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
>
>>In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
>>
>>>Malcolm Cadman wrote:-
>>>
>>>>David Gilham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>
>>>>I know that this one is no longer valid for David Gilham.
>>>>When I next see him I will get him to mail you his current one.
>>>>The info on your mail was very interesting, thanks.
>>>>Malcolm Cadman
>>>
>>>
>>>As far as I know, Dave's new email address is :-
>>>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>Yes, I know of that one, yet even that may not be currently valid.
>'tis valid.
>>
>>I know that David use 'internet cafes' for his web access, not his home
>>system.  So the 'totalise' was the one that he changed to.
>>
>>Of course, Tony, can mail him to confirm ... which I suspect he has
>>already done, knowing how efficient he is :-)
>No need - he emailed me  (8-)#

Good service, as usual :-)

-- 
Malcolm Cadman

Reply via email to