In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Dave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>
>
>On Sun, 10 Mar 2002, Al Feng wrote:
>
>> The significant problem [which *I* found] is the SHAPE of the top of the
>> QL's tiles ... if you are a moderately fast typist, you are not looking
>> at the tiles AND your fingers are not locked onto the tiles, either; so,
>> you will inevitably be striking the top edges of the cupped portion ...
>> or, at least, I was doing so.
>
>It's understandable. We are all individuals.
>
>SRL did not design the keyboard. Absolutely not. The key-caps are, in
>fact, part of a standard system which existed from ~1975 for making short
>run keyboards. I certainly used an ICL minicomputer with the same style
>and construction keyboard, in around 1981-2. I also used a late Datacom
>terminal with exactly the same kbd construction.

I've got the catalogue, somewhere, of the manufacturer who was
commissioned by Sinclair for the QL keyboards.  They are just a custom
version - to suit the QL layout of functions - of a standard range of
keyboards at the time.  Widely used in many other applications, not
necessarily just personal computers.

This being the case, Sinclair was able to get a good price per unit as
the mouldings already existed.

-- 
Malcolm Cadman

Reply via email to