[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [Eindhoven] > Not sure. I'm having a dinner planned for that evening. I'll see > what I can do...
I had much better things to do this weekend, too... but I've just acquired the train tickets to come to Eindhoven. >> The status of QPC, for example, won't change at all. > Why not? Why should it? In opposite to the other platforms QPC is still actively developed by me. This doesn't mean that you necessarily won't be able to build SMSQ/E for QPC. I could provide anybody who wants to do something with the necessary bits, they don't need to be freely available for that. And I don't remember you as somebody who is too shy to ask for something? > Personally, I think the important thing is that we have a coherent > OS for ALL of the machines it runs on.! I wouldn't like a situation > where QPC, or Q60, or Aurora or whatever has OS features that > the others don't have. Me neither. So what? > There is no doubt that an enormous amount of learning will be > needed at first. Be sure of that. I have a few years advantage and still don't know quite as much as I'd like to know. > Umm I beg to differ here. The colour drivers do exist, but they can't > be used from within the PE. Most people I know write for the PE, > so... I second that. That's why I was trying to change that fact. Marcel
