Phoebus Dokos wrote: > Oh one would, one would ;-) (Why not... it's fun to experiment!)
For fun, ok. But not for anything else. Graphics operations must by definition be enclosed by iow.xtop, you can't do this in basic. > Right but in any case, wouldn't a continuous access to a table in > memory be cached (as you say elsewhere?) thus increasing access > significantly? I don't really understand your approach anyway. Whether you calculate the offset within screen memory or within a table... where's the difference? The maths is the same. The latter just has additional overhead. > However in the S*Basic case (that you dread ;-) it probably would be > faster don't you think? In SBasic everything is f...airly slow, so why not just use the method that uses less memory? Marcel
