Hi Wolfgang, > > *** Distribution of executables for free was *not* forbidden in the first > > official statement! This has changed and caused severe implications on the > > availability of non-commercial work. *** > >I must take the blame for that - it was always INTENDED that the >binaries were not to be distributed other than through the resellers.
I don't blame you for tolerating distribution of SMSQ/E executables for free in the first statement. This is what Tony Tebby would have allowed us! The public ought to know it, even if it was published unintended. Peter
