In article <003901c20951$3ee82f40$5a065cc3@default>, Dilwyn Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes > >> I am terribly bored with the SMSQ/E 'Source' discussions ... any >chance >> of the details going 'off list' until there is something definite to >> report ? > >Isn't it the kind of discussion which could go onto ql-developers >list? > >While the whole issue of the sources needs to be sorted, it's in great >danger of being counter productive at the moment. Too many people >getting p***ed off with the length and impenetrable detail and legal >argument.
... I thought I was not alone :-) -- Malcolm Cadman
