On 1 Jun 2002, at 0:18, Joachim Van der Auwera wrote:

> 
> I think there is a major problem with the current licence.
> 
> What would happen if the registrar stops doing his or her work.

Then you ask TT to appoint a new one.

> The licence does not say how a registrar can be appointed, or who to
> contact. 
It does.
In fact, it would become impossible to make any improvements to the
> code, as there is nobody to approve any changes and no binaries can be
> distributed... What's more, depending on interpretation, it is even
> impossible to get the latest version of the source code...
> 
> In the current licence there is too much responsibility for the registrar.
> In fact, with it being a job which is unpaid, it could be plain impossible
> to de if there are many developments (I wish).

Oh if there are so many developments, believe me, I'll find a way to 
get them done. The concept of "key developer" come to mind..
.
Wolfgang
  • ... Nicholls, Bruce
    • ... P Witte
      • ... Dave
        • ... wlenerz
          • ... Richard Zidlicky
          • ... Jeremy Taffel
            • ... Roy Wood
              • ... Jeremy Taffel
            • ... wlenerz
              • ... Joachim Van der Auwera
                • ... wlenerz
                • ... Joachim Van der Auwera
                • ... Jerome Grimbert
                • ... Bill Waugh
                • ... dndsystems1
              • ... Jeremy Taffel
                • ... Φοίβος Ρ. Ντόκος
            • ... P WItte
          • ... Roy Wood
        • ... wlenerz
          • ... Dave Walker

Reply via email to