??? 18/9/2002 4:51:49 ??, ?/? Dave P <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ??????:
> > > >On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, Phoebus Dokos wrote: > >> In essence you are including the second ">" within the url whereas you >> should leave it out. Turnpike (and any receiving mailer) correctly >> interprets the %3E as part of the url and feeds it to the browser... >> however there's no address that corresponds to that (unless of course your >> file is appropriately named: page.html%3E > >%3E is 63, and CHR$(63) is > > >Both examplkes are wrong, but for different reasons. > >Tony has an example where the tag close is encoded into the URL, and >Phoebus' version omits it altogether. As tags should never be embedded, >only nested, both are wrong. The outer <> should be dropped, and to be >viewed correctly in text only clients like qeymail, the inner tags should >be ignored too. Yes but mine works :-) Dave is correct though, tags should be nested, never embedded (unless your name is Microsoft ;-) Phoebus
