Geoff Wicks writes: > In fairness to Wolfgang let it be said that this is not a new problem. I > have known about it for some weeks, and you can be certain that a lot of > activity has gone on in the background to try to resolve the situation.
That is also my understanding. <> > Surely an extra 10 Euros per machine is not much to ask? I doubt it has anything to do with the 10 Euros. The whole point of the license is not to milk the punter for more dosh but rather to unify any future developments. Instead of biting the bullet and trying to make the best of an imperfect arrangement by working with the license from the inside, it appears we may have a rebel camp that is hell-bound on doing what it pleases whatever anyone else may think. Isnt that what its all about? The license is an attempt to embody the wishes of the original author, Tony Tebby which, as far as I am aware, he is perfectly entitled to do, legally and morally. If we dont like the terms of the license we are perfectly free to use the systems we already have a license for, move over to a system with a license more congenial to our way of thinking or take up plane-spotting instead. The last thing we need, Im sure everyone agrees, is a new destructive split. If we have one now is not Wolfgang's fault. Hes just doing his job. The way to resolve this quickly is for the dissenters to think things carefully through and either clarify their position, put their affairs in order, or withdraw from the field. Per
