If we're aiming that high, do we have Java RT (or better) on the wishlist? Might as 
well put X on there too...

Steve Oliver


> 
> From: Phoebus Dokos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2002/11/19 Tue AM 12:57:05 EST
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: RE: [ql-users] One box or two
> 
> 
> ??? 18/11/2002 6:33:43 ??, ?/? Dave P <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ??????:
> 
> 
> >What makes the QL not relevant is that people are WILLIGN to pay an arm
> >and a leg to get something that will use up the resources of a 3GHz
> >machine. Scary!
> >
> 
> Yep and they end up losing the other two as well when they repeatedly bang them 
> against the wall when the PeeCee hangs just at the moment they were backing the 
> damn thing up :-)
> 
> 
> 
> >800MHz coming, eh? Anyone up for writing DVD/video s/w for SMSQ? :o)
> >
> 
> 
> 800 MHz or not Video playback of ANY kind won't be feasible (unless you have 1Gig of 
> memory or so) until true background IOSS operation is possible (ie rationalization 
>of the 
> IO, metadrivers etc...)
> 
> 
> Phoebus
> 
> 
> 
> 

-------
Steve Oliver
Oak Ridge TN

Reply via email to